“Astrology for the 2024 US Presidential Election points to an evenly balanced contest. It is extremely difficult to predict a winner from the horoscope for election day and the transits and progression to both candidates’ charts.”
A word of advice: Don’t use crystal meth when attempting to interpret charts.
Why would you use a “horoscope for election day?” Since you don’t know anything about astrology, we’ll educate you.
A chart cast for Election Day is a quasi-horary chart. Effectively the question you’re asking is, “Who will win the Election?”
The rules of horary astrology say that as a 3rd Party to the event, you have no standing. Therefore, you are neither entitled to know the outcome of the Election using horary astrology, nor do you have a right to know the outcome of the Election using horary astrology.
Transits? Not one single transit in Kamala Harris’ chart indicated a possible win.
However, based on some small differences in their transits and the likelihood of a contested election and violent protests, I predict a very narrow Kamala Harris victory.
How’s it feel riding the Failboat?
The election wasn’t contested. There were no violent protests. And the margin of victory was hardly narrow.
“The astrology of the 2024 US election is dominated by Sun trine Saturn (/sun-trine-saturn/). It gives a reserved and conservative outlook favoring the Republicans and Donald Trump. However, it also represents stability and security as opposed to change and uncertainty, which favors incumbency and, therefore, Kamala Harris.”
What source are you citing for you delineations?
.
Your interpretation of Sun trine Saturn is just plain wrong. You can cite no authority to support your claim so that means you’re just making things up as you go along which is exactly what we’d expect a hack like you to do. Also, Saturn in Pisces is anything but stability. Don’t you know what the signs mean?
“The other significant aspect in the 2024 election horoscopes is Mars opposite Pluto…This aspect of conflict makes the loser feel unfairly victimized and persecuted by a powerful enemy. It suggests a contested election, subversion, propaganda, aggression, mass violence, male violence, vandalism, destruction, and armed resistance against the government.”
Mr. Astrology King, when are you going to grow up and accept the fact that Uranus, Neptune and Pluto do nothing in a chart and have no meaning?
The fact that your prediction failed prediction proves Uranus, Neptune and Pluto do nothing.
“Mercury conjunct fixed star Acrab …(a contested election result)….Jupiter conjunct fixed star Bellatrix (a contested election result)….Uranus conjunct fixed star Algol…(a contested election result).”
The reason you’re riding the Failboat is because you’re using the fixed-stars incorrectly and you’re making up the meanings as you go along. Uranus, Neptune and Pluto do not increase the accuracy of interpretations nor do they increase the accuracy of predictions. In fact, they do just the opposite as you have proven for us.
The astrology charts of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump both have the Sun opposite the Moon, which makes them competitive.
Wrong. You’re such a bad astrologer you can’t even phrase aspects correctly. You always list the faster planet first for oppositions. It’s Moon opposition Sun. You can cite no authority to support your delineation which is one of those “make-it-up-as-you-go-along” delineations because you are doing histrology which is not astrology.
We’ll school you.
Moon opposition Sun means change(s).
This might come as quite a shock to you, but the way we determine whether those changes are positive or negative overall, or a mixed bag for a person is we examine the signs, the houses and the other stars co-present with or in aspect to Moon and Sun.
In both charts, the Moon-Sun opposition falls on the 11th/5th Axis. The 11th House is the House of Good Fate. The 5th House is the House of [Random Chance] Good Luck. That’s a very positive indicator but you’re oblivious to the reality that Moon and Sun are Lights, not planets and aspects to Moon and Sun are very important.
The non-astrologer only sees the Moon-Sun opposition. A real astrologer sees Moon right trine Mars right sextile Sun right trine Saturn right sextile Moon opposition Sun in the chart of Kamala Harris and Sun right trine Jupiter right sextile Moon opposition Sun in the chart of Donald Trump.
It’s apparent you’re too incompetent to correctly interpret either configuration in their charts. Both configurations are overwhelmingly positive for both candidates. However, in other people’s charts, Moon opposition Sun is so horrific it is a nightmare from which the only escape is suicide (and that’s what some people did).
Harris’s tighter orb (0°09′) gives her an advantage over Trump’s (1°43′).
Um, no. That is not what it means. The orb is of no relevance whatsoever and thanks for proving us right. Your brand of histrology is so very FUBAR.
On election day, Uranus retrograde conjunct Algol activates their Midheavens: conjunct Jupiter for Harris and conjunct Midheaven for Trump.
Uranus plays no role in anyone’s chart. How many people on Earth had Uranus retrograde conjunct Algol on their Midheaven’s? What did they win?
Your use of fixed-stars is unorthodox and violates the rules of astrology which is why you are a spectacular failure. If only you would stop practicing histrology and start practicing astrology you might actually get something right.
“As I wrote in the post about Kamala Harris, the numerous similarities in their charts suggest the 2024 US election contest is evenly balanced.”
Another example of incredibly bad astrology. Whether their charts are similar or dissimilar is totally irrelevant. Had you bother to perform a complete interpretation of Harris’s chart you would have see it is not “evenly balanced.”
The rules of astrology say you must interpret the chart in its entirety before you can attempt to make any predictions. Interpreting a chart in its entirety means accurately judging the conditions of all 7 stars, delineating all 12 houses and interpreting all figures and configurations in the chart. You failed to do that. Why?
Is it because you’re so sodding incompetent?
Kamala Harris was doomed to lose that election the day she was born. If you really were an astrologer you would have known that. A novice astrologer would have seen the 8 great big giant humongous gargantuan red flags telling you she was doomed to lose:
- Mercury domicile ruler of the Gemini Ascendant afflicted in the 6th House
- Venus domicile master of the Gemini Ascendant in the Virgo 4th House afflicted by Mercury in the 6th House
- Jupiter domicile ruler and master of the Pisces 10th House afflicted by the malefic rays of Mars and Saturn
- Afflicted Jupiter ruled by afflicted Venus (the domicile ruler and master of the Taurus 12th House)
- Jupiter retrograde and being the domicile ruler and master of the Pisces 10th House
- Saturn retrograde conjunct the Midheaven Point linking government and authority to her career
- Afflicted Jupiter domicile ruler and master of the 10th House in the 12th House indicating she destroys her career
- Saturn right square Jupiter indicating demotion, loss of position and/or loss of power
In stark contrast, Donald Trump has no afflicted stars and one elevated star: Mars in the Leo 1st House. Trump also has Sun conjunct the Lot of Exaltation in the 11th House of Good Fate. True, Trump does have Venus as domicile ruler and master of the Taurus 10th House in the 12th House meaning he ruins his career, but that was activated during the 2020 Election.
Another reason you suck is your total lack of objectivity.
“The table below shows the election day transits for both candidates.”
And that means what, to us?
It means you’re incompetent. Transit-to-natal is not a predictive method. It never was a predictive method. It also means you have not been keeping up-to-date on current trends in astrology. That’s probably because you fancy yourself an “expert” and you already know everything. You truly are a legend in your own mind.
“The precession correction value of 0°50′ has been added….”
What the hell for?
Is that you’re “Wow!-factor” that you use to impress people and deceive them into believing you’re some kind of authority? If you really were an astrologer then you’d know that there is neither a logical reason nor a scientific reason nor an astrological reason to correct for precession.
A real astrologer knows that greater precision does not produce more accurate interpretations or predictions.
It certainly didn’t help you.
I think the main difficulty in predicting a winner is transiting Uranus….
Like we said, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto do nothing other than hamper people’s ability to correctly interpret charts and make predictions. Strange how the people who didn’t use them correctly predicted the outcome.
“Based on the transits alone, I am leaning toward a Donald Trump victory.”
Strange how you ignored the most important transit in Trump’s chart: Retrograde Saturn transiting his Pisces 8th House. In fact, transiting retrograde Saturn was the only star a real astrologer needed to see to correctly predict the winner of the election.
Sucks to be you, fumbling about like an incompetent topah.
You probably think the 7th House is legal matters and lawsuits because you’re just as stupid as the ass-clown Arab and Persian astrologers who messed up astrology. It is the 8th House that is legal matters and lawsuits. It always was since the very beginning, so the 8th House is legal matters and lawsuits just like it is in Jyotish astrology.
Why? Because that is what was written in the Jyotish text Yavanajātaka.
The English translation of the Sanskrit Yavanajātaka is “Greek astrology.” That’s why.
A prosecutor, or plaintiff in a civil lawsuit, seeing a retrograde planet transiting their 8th House is going to be balling their freaking eyes out. But a criminal defendant or a defendant in a civil action is going to be doing the Happy-Happy-Joy-Joy-Dance. Why? Well, what does “retrograde” mean?
Retrograde means that some person (not necessarily you) or some thing is going to suffer a serious set-back, a major reversal of fortune or circumstance, or be rejected, denied, thwarted, or frustrated, or be ruined or destroyed, or fall apart. And it means that 100% of the time in 100% of charts no exceptions ever. None.
Contrary to popular belief, one is allowed to use common sense in astrology. Sadly, petrified dinosaur doo-doo has more common sense than 98% of the ass-clowns masquerading as astrologers on the internet, like you.
On Election Day, November 5, 2024, Donald Trump was a criminal defendant in criminal actions filed by the U.S. government and State governments in the District of Columbia and the States of Florida, Georgia and New York.
Why would the criminal lawsuits filed against Trump:
- Suffer a serious set-back?
- Suffer a major reversal of circumstance?
- Be rejected, denied, thwarted, or frustrated?
- Be ruined or destroyed?
- Fall apart?
If Kamala Harris was the winner, would she order a halt to the criminal prosecution of Trump? Order the dismissal of the lawsuits? Pardon Trump? No, those lawsuits continue on full speed ahead and Trump likely ends up in prison.
So the only common sense logical conclusion is that the lawsuits get dismissed because Donald Trump wins. In reality, Donald Trump won and all those criminal complaints against Trump were dismissed.
That’s just how easy it was to predict the winner.
Man, do you suck. You just reek of suckiness. And you have the unmitigated gall to call yourself an astrologer?
“The Secondary Pregressed [sic] chart is a forecast technique that equates one day after birth to one year of life. It is supposed to reflect your personal evolution over time. The aspect orbs are limited to one degree.”
Astrology doesn’t give a damn about anyone’s “personal evolution.” We won’t even get into the fact that the concept of “personal evolution” is 100% subjective and unverifiable, and therefore has no place in astrology.
Too bad you’re not a real astrologer. If you were, then you would know that secondary progressed charts are so-called because they are not a primary predictive method; hence they’re a secondary method. Since you’re clueless and have no idea what you’re doing you didn’t use a primary predictive method to identify which stars to be looking at in the secondary progressed chart in the first place.
You didn’t even cast the secondary progressed chart correctly. The correct method for casting a secondary progressed chart is to convert your age from calendar time to astrology time, add the years as days to the date, add the fractional days as minutes to the birth date, then recast the chart using the new date and time.
Once you’ve done that, you’ll need to correct Moon’s position in the secondary progressed chart. Since Moon moves at a rate of 13° per day it is progressed at a rate of 1° per year. The Renaissance astrologers did not understand the method and for whatever reason erroneously came to believe that you progress all the stars at rate of 1° per year and then we have the nitwit Naiboth and his silly 59′ of arc per year and all the other idiots who contributed silliness.
Either way, Mars’s opposite Pluto brings the potential for contested election results and mob violence. The fixed stars reinforce the likelihood of violent protests. I think this is more likely with Harris victory.
You failed because you’re not an astrologer and your methods and techniques are all wrong.
But we do thank you for proving Pluto is totally useless.
I am leaning toward a Kamala Harris victory because I believe the lunar eclipse and Uranus aspecting her Jupiter is more fortunate than their aspects to Trump’s Midheaven. Kamal Harris also has Sun sextile Uranus transit on election day and progressed Moon sextile Uranus. Both indicate positive change.
You totally botched the interpretation. A lunar or solar eclipse occurring in the 10th House means the same thing today, right now, this minute, that it meant 2,600 years ago and it will mean the same thing 2,600 years from now. It means failure or ruination.
But, thanks once again for proving Uranus does nothing.
The final thing that makes me predict Kamala Harris will win the 2024 US presidential election is Mars opposite Pluto and the fixed stars on election day. They indicate a contested result a mass violence. Given recent history, this seems more likely following a Donald Trump loss.
When are you going to pull your head out of your ass and finally realize Pluto never does anything in any chart for any person or any thing? How many charts do you need to see with Mars opposition Pluto and no mass violence occurred?
The stars have no relationship to the Greco-Roman gods of the same name other than they have the same name. You cannot prove their is a relationship because none of the Greek texts equate the stars to the Greco-Roman gods. The stars don’t even have a gender. Moon and Venus are referred to in Greek texts as “it” not “she”. Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are referred to as “it” not “he.”
You call yourself an astrologer and you don’t even know when you’re being lied to.
Pluto entered Cancer in 1912, not 1914. Cancer is a sign of peace and tranquility. The false claim that Pluto entered Cancer in 1914 and “caused” WW I is not only a lie it’s absurd. What happened in the prior Pluto Cancer Ingress? There was nothing peace. No wars. All three “global” wars ended prior to Pluto’s entry into Cancer. In the Pluto Cancer Ingress before that (1423) there were no wars. There was only a couple of minor skirmishes between England and France in a war that had been on-going long before Pluto entered Cancer. The Crusaders were already crusading when Pluto entered Cancer in 1179. No wars after Pluto entered Cancer in 934. And 3 wars were in-progress for years before Pluto entered Cancer in 689.
Your claims are historically and astrologically unsupportable.
What did Einstein say? Insanity is doing the same wrong thing over and over and expecting different results.
“The Ascendant (AC) is the physical manifestation of the soul. It rules physical appearance, overall health and first impressions. But it can also be a shield or mask to guard the inner, authentic nature. Kamala Harris’s Ascendant is in the Sign of Gemini, but because of the precession of the equinoxes, it is in the Constellation of Taurus. I use the Fixed Stars and Constellations like the ancient astrologers, not the Signs and Houses of modern astrology.”
That’s why you suck and you why you fail. Like a broken clock, you might be “right” once in a while.
You are a Modern astrologer masquerading as something else. Your histrology is not even remotely related to the ancient astrologers. And contrary to your false claim, the “ancient astrologers” did not use fixed-stars the way you do.
We congratulate you on your Equivocation Fallacy. Signs are not constellations and constellations are not signs. The “ancient astrologers” used signs, not constellations.
The gasoline and diesel engines are a perfect analogy for Western and Jyotish astrology. Like the gasoline engine, Western came first. Like the diesel engine, Jyotish came later. You cannot put diesel in a gasoline engine or gasoline in a diesel engine just as you cannot take parts off a diesel engine and put them on a gasoline engine and expect it to work because it won’t work and it could never possibly work. Likewise, you cannot take concepts, elements or methods from Jyotish and use them in Western because it simply will not work.
The whole “Tropical vs Sidereal” debate is a manufactured nothing-burger conflict by ass-clowns who are totally clueless and know nothing about astrology or who are devious attempting to sow dissent and create chaos.
According to historians, the Greek conquest of Persian initiates the process of “Hellenization.” Persian culture was literally transformed into Greek culture overnight. It was ethnic Greeks living in northwestern India under the Seleucid Empire that introduced astrology to the Indians. The Indians already had a divination method most know as “the mansions of the Moon” and the Indians grafted that onto Greek astrology much in the same way the Greeks grafted the Egyptian decan system onto astrology.
The Parthinians who conquered the Seleucid Empire in the 1st Century BCE had a hatred for all things-Greek and attempted to stamp out Greek culture. The Greeks in the West were cut-off from the Greeks in the East, meaning the Greeks living in modern-day Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India (primarily the Kashmir and Punjab regions).
For that reason, Greek astrology in India evolved differently and it evolved using the sidereal zodiac.
In Western astrology, the signs are everything and provide us with interpretive clues in both natal and mundane charts and the predictive charts arising from them. In Jyotish, the signs are meaningless; nothing more than place-holders to tell you in which house the stars are situated.
Which system, Western or Jyotish, is better? Just like the gasoline and diesel engines, neither. They both do the same job and they do it effectively, but only if you follow the rules.
The great hypocrisy is your claim that you do astrology like the ancients, and yet everything you do has the foul odor of Modern astrology clinging to it like white on rice.
Had you actually cast the chart and interpreted it the way ancient Greeks like Antigonus or Valens or Antiochus or the Romans like Thrysallus and Ballibius had you would have seen Kamala Harris had ZERO chance of winning the election.